Chaotic Nature Essay Example for Free

Chaotic Nature EssayThe disorganised nature of the Nazi Government organize explains the failures in German state of fight production during the Second demesne War. Discuss. There is ample evidence that Germanys contend production levels change magnitude during the Second World War in 1942, when ammunition, tanks and core arms increased by significant percentages payable to Albert Speer teaseing constraints on businesses, and increasing the number of workers. However, one cannot not deny that the chaotic nature of the Nazi Government structure undermined war production excessively, due to the fact the German thrift was not fully mobilised for war. It is also evident that the shortage of raw materials and parturiency affected the economy massively, furthermore with the SS remaining loyal to themselves murdering six million Jews instead of seeking labour. The key factor of the failures in German war production is that the Nazi democracy was too chaotic and remained lo yal to their ideology rather than to the war social movement, with too many agencies competing for any consistent policy to be formulated olibanum repose war production.Certainly, the chaotic nature of the Nazi Government is the most significant factor of Germanys failed war production. Hitler planned to start the war in 1942, 3 years later than when it officially started, additionally he didnt plan when and how he was going to attack the USSR. The actual mobilisation of the German economy was marred by inefficiency and poor co-ordination. Additionally, Nazi leadership was shocking, as the pressures resulting from the premature outbreak of war created problems, due to many agencies projects encouraged being ready for 1943.As a result, all the agencies continued to function in their own way, and not together which created conflict. Thus, the Nazi economy was characterised by shortages, duplicates and waste with Britain spending half as frequently and producing 50% more. Therefor e, with all the Nazi agencies working on their own to impress Hitler, and not together, there was no clear plan in how to increase war production, just ways in which to electrify the Fuhrer and not total war.Additionally, Gauleiter also had different aims than the state, and aimed to Germanise and not develop the war economy, which also lead to mass shortages in labour and raw materials. Indeed, the SS played a huge role in limiting Germanys war production. The SS were in charge of all the occupied assiduity camps, and towards the end of the war they were in charge of 150 firms exploiting slave labour to extract raw materials and manufacture textiles, armaments, and household goods. Additionally, the SS never exploited occupied countries economy, thus did not use their industries successfully.Heinrich Himmler, the leader of the SS clashed with Speer due to the fact concentration camp factories were inefficient, as Speer preferred using paid labour in occupied countries. In conjunct ion with this point, labour in the concentration camps contained horrific conditions, thus workers could not work efficiently in the camps to produce the amounts anticipated. Therefore, if the SS exploited occupied countries economies, then they would cast been able to use paid labour, resulting in the workers working harder to the war effort thus producing more raw materials vital to the war effort.In addition, the SS were in the care for of exterminating 6 million Jews, wasting ammunition, raw materials, and supplies on them keeping them in concentration camps. One cannot contradict on the fact that Nazi ideology check Germanys war production. The Nazis viewed the war as a radical war, in which the superior Aryans would triumph over the Slavs and inferior groups and they aimed to make the whole of europium become Jew Free. The Nazis had utilised the Great Depression to gain support, promising bread and work.As a result, Hitler always believed that he needed to put the people bread and butter at the same time as supporting a war economy thus Hitler wanted to keep up with the production of consumer goods. By doing this concentrating on consumer goods as opposed to total war production vastly slowed down the production of armaments, ammunition, and many more materials essential to the war effort. These nationalistic beliefs also undermined labour, as conscription of women was ideologically based, with the Nazi view of women revolving around Kinder, Kuche, and Kirche (children, kitchen, church).Consequently, due to such nationalist views and remaining loyal to Nazi ideology, war production could not increase due to a huge shortage in labour, with women persisting to be viewed as the stereotypical housewife, thus if women were conscripted to the labour force, war production would have been of vast improvements. Additionally, the Jewish race could have been used as a labour force to the war effort, instead of being held absorbed at concentration camps waitin g to be murdered.However, putting a side Nazi ideology, it is said that Albert Speer nearly worked a miracle, by employing women and making concentration camps as labour camps so there was some success in the war economy. Finally, because of the catastrophic nature of the Nazi Government, labour and raw materials were extremely short, thus resorted to total war as an attempt to quickly increase war production. Natural resources such as iron, coal, oil and many more needed to be produced at tolerable standards that were needed for a sustained war effort.In order to fight a major war, Germany needed the annex of other nations resources, which initially failed due to the failure of military Blitzkreig in 1942. Additionally, these shortages of raw materials were due to the lack of labour in Germany, as womens labour declined from 14. 6 million, to 14. 1 million. However, womens labour peaked to 14. 9 million in 1944, due to the actions of Speer, who employed more women in arms factories which did however increase Germanys war production. Speers actions were stiff during total war, in the process of rationalisation when he made huge improvements in the economy.So yes, during total war and rationalisation, Germanys war production was looking at positive, but due to the small production of raw materials and a shortage of workers, Germany could not produce enough to make a real significance in the war effort. Undeniably, Germany did see some success in war production due to the actions of Albert Speer, having such a good relationship with Hitler he was able to relax constraints on businesses that were made to fit the Nazis wishes. Thus, this encouraged his programme of industrial self-responsibility to provide mass production in Germany which inevitably succeeded.Nevertheless, there is no denying the reality that it was originally the chaotic nature of the government that caused failure within Germanys war production. Due to Nazi ideology, there was no intense loya lty to the war effort shown by any agencies, as they all acted to impress Hitler, thus did not work together stalling war production massively. In conjunction with this, the chaotic nature of the Nazi government deeply effected labour, with a shortage of female workers. Finally, as a result, raw materials were significantly behind, thus there was no proper sustained war effort.