The Differences in Views About Human Nature Essay Example for Free

The Differences in Views About Human Nature EssayHe believes that Individual effort was needed to cultivate hotshotself, precisely ones natural tendencies were good to begin with. In this way, Mencius has integrated elements of Taoism into his theory. Basically, heap are born(p) well with good intentions, but they must work to maintain their good nature. Mencius says, Every person has a heart-mind which feels for others . He applies this to a famous example if one witnessed a child falling into a well, it is not possible to not feel anything. Every person has the heart-mind that would be shocked and sympathetic, which may become the motivation to exemplify and save the child.It would not be for the sake on being on good ground with the childs parents, or be praised by the neighbors . However, if one listens to their senses of desire, I dont take to be involved or If I try to save the child, I might injure myself in the process, then they would stop themselves from helpi ng. It is primal to point out that Mencius did not mention anything about how ones responding act, and that it is having the feeling that counts. On the other hand, Xunzi believed that human nature is bad. Nobody is born with principles accustomed in their nature.For that reason, people must be educated and cultivated in ethics to become good. Human nature is evil, and truth is caused by intentional activity. A person is born with feelings of envy and hate. If he gives way to them, they will headliner him to violence and crime, and any sense of loyalty and good faith will be abandoned. However, he besides believed that, although human nature is bad, people still have the capacity to becoming good. For example, a great leader like Martin Luther King was born no differently from Adolf Hitler.They both inherited the same nature at birth. Applying Xunzis theory, the differences would be that one practiced benevolence and righteousness, as well as followed the proper rules and sta ndards, and one (Hitler) obviously did not. This also suggests that these elements are principles that have to be known first before being rank into practice. It is about the environment that one is brought up with that influences the way one acts. If you do not know a man, look at his friends if you do not know a ruler, look at his attendants. Environment is the important thingEnvironment is the important thing As for the basis for ruling a country, I would personally choose Menciuss assertion of human nature is good. For example, if the leader of America thought about Iraq in Xunzis perspective, that human nature is bad, they would be on guard and suspicious of the motives of the Iraqi people. This leads to the feeling of unease and both sides are tensed. The inability to trust will result to both countries expecting the worst, and therefore making the shoes more aggravated and war will be more likely to break out.While, by cerebration in Menciuss perspective, America would only assume the good in Iraqi people, and that there mass be a solution made through a mutual understanding through trust, decency and self-actualization. No more nuclear weapons will be produced and less conflicts will happen, which leads to less innocent people dying. It is correct to assume that people are born good, so it is easier to feel security and trust each other. snow% Mencius for everyone is the perfect recipe to WORLD PEACE. Thats right.