Making a Case for Premarital Education

Based on on-line(prenominal) information equanimous from empirical analysis, professional/public opinion, and rational debate, Stanley (2001) constructed four arguments that support an change magnitude need for premarried charge. The arguments were presented for the plausible benefits of engaging in pre matrimonial interference efforts on a broad scale (Stanley, 2001, p. 272). The authors arguments acknowledge 1. Using pre marital strategies to slow couples down in an effort to forego them time get to know one another better sooner jumping into marriage. . Using premarital counseling strategies to emphasize the importance of the marital union and the long-term family and societal consequences attached to the decision to marry. 3. The use of premarital strategies will demonstrate that there are resources available to assist couples when they strike to experience marital discord. 4. Couples participation in premarital education programs are less believably to view as mar ital problems and are less likely to divorce (Stanley, 2001).Stanley (2001) presents the arguments as possible research programs that could be studied pull ahead to help develop a better understanding of what strategies foundation be implemented to lower and/or prevent divorce and decrease marital distress. Scott Stanley makes some compelling arguments for the need of premarital counseling and patchs emphasis on all of troupe victorious an attitude of prevention in regards to ontogenesis strategies to effectively muckle with the high divorce rate and high levels of marital discord that our country is currently battling.While the arguments have a sound priming coat are very rational, they lack validity from empirical research. Stanley (2001) acknowledges the need for more empirical research is needed to determine how to successfully prevent marital distress for society as a whole and lower the current divorce rates. Silliman and Schumm (2000) support the need for more researc h on this head when they discuss how further attention to theoretical frameworks to guide premarital counseling is needed although the research and practice of premarital counseling have already been established.A high rate of divorce is one of many social problems touch on society today. Stanley (2001) states, it is estimated that approximately 40% or more of red-hot marriages among the jr. generation will eventually end in divorce (p. 272). at that place currently seems to be a push to put things in place to help prevent marital and family breakdown and the suggestion that couples should be take to undergo premarital education to help improve and prevent marital distress.Risch et al (2003) support the use of premarital counseling when they state, marriage set programs have been used by practitioners and couples for decades, generally speaking programs aim to elicit the quality and stability of marriages and the content is chosen with this goal in judgment (p. 2). This prev entative approach is an area that is receiving much attention worldwide as some governmental units are requiring premarital counseling as a means to reduce divorce and strengthen families (Stahmann, 2000, p. 104).It is certainly advantageous to have preventative programs in place to assist couples who make a consignment to the union of marriage. This union affects the couple directly, their growing family, their separate families, and society as a whole. Premarital counseling strategies can be viewed as societys commitment towards promotion and the attainment of a happy and healthy life. Anything preventative should be viewed as worthwhile means to the end. While new research is being developed, there is a lot to say for taking the necessary steps to put preventative measures in place to deal with what is currently known about the topic.Premarital counseling should be viewed as a practice to promote general health to the entire family system. The preventative measures associated w ith these strategies can cleanse the entire family system as they can assist in the decrease in marital discord and divorce, which have a own and affect relationship with domestic violence, child abuse, and mental health issues connect to the consequence of a broken marriage. This is a good example of how an troy ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure (Benjamin Franklin).