History of Electronic Media Essay

The history of providing discipline has been shaped by innovations and innovators. This paper attempts to chronicle the take issueent factors and events that conduct to the media adorn of today.1) Congress and the FCC began deregulating broadcast and argumentation television in the fresh 1970s. Describe the ideologies which motivated these deregulations. What assortments in the television industry occurred as a result of these deregulations? Include two of the following in your discussion fiscal Interest and Syndication conventions, Telecommunications action of 1996, media ownership debates in the 2000s and intellectual property regulations in the 2000s.The Financial and Syndication Rules, or more(prenominal)(prenominal) popularly k forthrightn as Fib-Syn, were implemented by the Federal Communications Commission in 1970 with the objective of increase political programming diversity thus breaking the monopoly of the tierce major TV meshs in the United States CBS, fre shman rudiment and NBC. Its rationale was to democratize UHF air travelwaves qualification it easier for fissiparous television producers to screen the television market. The encounters primarily targeted two atomic number 18as to disempower the large-minded networks freeing television programs from the ownership of the networks after its origin run and the induction of in-house syndication arms in the major networks.The idea was to discourage the networks monopoly on tv programs and restricting the networks part in syndication. These steps would substantially reduce communication channel incentive and lead to the separation of production and distribution practices in the capacious networks. The FCC justified the implementation of Fin-Syn as beneficial for independent television producers since it gave them the larger part of production do goods and allowing them a foothold in the business of syndication. The democratization of syndication would lead to a wider distrib ution of shows and prevented the networks from its exclusive use in their affiliated stations. Supporters of the influence envisioned a television industry where sophisticated and much more diverse programs would be available to the viewers ( McAllister , www.museum.tv).The Telecommunications bring of 1996 was promulgated by the FCC to address issues regarding the rapid development of telecommunication technologies in the United States. It contained new rules and regulations regarding TV, Radio, Cable, Telephone and Internet renovations. President Clinton, when he sign-language(a) it into legislation, proclaimed that the act would stimulate investment, promote rival, provide open get to for all citizens to the Information Superhighway (Clinton, White House press kindling 1996).Upon closer inspection, the Telecommunication enactment of 1996 was the final step in disassembling the aliment of Fin-Syn Rule. The act loosened rules on media ownership in traditional media forms su ch(prenominal)(prenominal) as TV and radio, thus empowering them to compete with emerging media technologies such as cable and the Internet allowing for the development of new and innovative services.However, the implementation of two the Financial and Syndication Rules of the FCC and the telecommunications Act of 1996 met harsh criticisms once they were fully implemented.The introduction of Fin-Syn bred more problems than solutions. Most critics consigned out that instead of empowering independent TV producers, it just shifted the competition from one Goliath to another. Instead of competing with the big networks, the independent TV producers where now pitted against large production organization such as Disney/ABC and Warner. In the end, it was these larger TV production companies that benefited financially from producing television shows with independent companies opting to produce cheaper productions such as talk shows and game shows. Thus, it produced more received shows rat her than innovating the television industry.Eventually, television groups especially television distributors called for a change in the implementation of Fin-Syn which eventually led to FCC totally removing the rule in 1995. Studies showed that although there were periods of diversity on TV programs from 1970s to the 1990s, the general endpoint was that there was no signifi brookt changes in the programs in the implementation of the FCC rule (Einstein, p. 5). With the disappearance of the rule, productions and distribution companies started to merge especially in the big three networks. This culminated in the emergence of FOX Network and its merger with Paramount and Warner Bros., a step followed by Disney when they bought and merged with ABC Network.The deregulation that resulted from the implementation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act fueled much debate on media ownership and responsibility. Questions arose on whether the the Act did deliver its promise of innovative media serv ices from increased competition and perform the public interest with increased diversity in media programs and information. Critics cite that the scarce ones who benefited from the Act were media moguls who were able to merge with other media corporations and in essence creating media monopolies that could hand the power to bind information. William Melody reveals that media entrepreneurs will perpetually look for profit and economic efficiency leading to media monopolies which threaten freedom of speech (Melody, p. 32). implicated groups have also reasoned that public interest have always been the core value of media regulation and not profit, and to diminish government control on ownership would mean violating public inters. Deregulating media ownership can sole(prenominal) lead to a monopoly of information resulting in less diversity, von Neumann noted that the creation of media conglomerates have led to the mass media having similar theme and world-view (Neumann, p.130). On the other hand, those who were in favor of the Act identified it as a much needed move in revolutionizing media. By allowing media corporations to merge, it has led to a more comprehensive and cohesive delivery of information. Supporters also point out that instead of eliminating diversity, viewers have had much more program options with th emergence of 24 hours news channels such as CNN and FOX intelligence and specialized channels such as denudation and History (Compaine, www.reason.com). In fact, Adam Thierer revealed that instead of the lack of diversity of programs, audiences are actually experiencing information overload due to explosion of media options. He pointed out that todays media environment is diverse and characterized by information copiousness (Thierer, p.2). The issue, as FCC concluded in revising the Telecommunication Act, was whether media companies will be able to dominate the distribution of news and information in both market, but whether they will be a ble to be heard at all among the cacophony of voices vying for the attention of the Americans (FCC proceedings, p.149)2) The three broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC did not guinea pig a broadcast network competitor until discombobulate emerged in the eighties and the WB, UPN and Univision grew in the 1990s. Why did these networks emerge when they did? What regulatory changes aided their growth? How did they differ from the other networks in terms of their relationships with their affiliates? What audiences did they target and what types of programs did they use to do so? How did they change as they grew? You may choose one or more network(s) to illustrate your points.From the 1950s to the 1980s, the big three networks prevail the American airwaves. individual and local television networks would occasionally penetrate the national airwaves but almost of these did not survive due to financial constraints. It was in 1986 so far that the counterbalance rival to the big three em erged with the establishment of FOX Network.It started out dabbling in TV business by producing and distributing shows for the three big networks. In 1985, Rupert Murdoch bought 50% shares in the 20th Century Fox movie and television studios. When Murdoch at long last achieved full ownership of the studios, he proceeded to buy television stations have by Metromedia which gave Murdoch a foothold in the major U.S. cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Dallas, Houston and Chicago (www.teletronic.co.uk). This move would spur Murdoch to create a quartern network.In a brilliant move, the new Fox network labeled their new venture as a satellite-delivered programming service(www.teletronic.co.uk). This enabled Murdoch, who was not a citizen, to bypass FCC rules such as foreign-ownership and the definition of FCC of a network as airing more than 20 hours of programming per hebdomad. These enabled Fox to operate unhindered by the FCC rules on networks, thus creation able to sti ll distribute its TV productions to other networks but only airing 2 hours of primetime shows as opposed to the 3 hours of the big Networks. When it was launched in October 1986, almost 96 stations were connected to Fox enabling it to remove 80% of American audiences.Before making it big, Fox had to start from boodle in expanding its audience share. The network first major release was the modern Show with Joan Rivers. They hoped to capture the 1130pm late-night slot and targeting young audiences. This strategy however failed as ratings fell with viewers switching back to their previous stations. notwithstanding these failures, Fox continued to lure the younger to middle -aged viewers with shows such as Tracy Ulman which won the station its first Emmy, Marriedwith Children which would be its first biggest hit and 21 Jump Street which was its first drama. These shows were some of the first forays of the network into the Sunday prime-time slot. Although they were received lukewarml y at first, these shows would gain nerve impulse in the coming years. The success of Fox would lead to FCC relaxing the Fin-Syn rule and redefining their concept of network, which would finally result in the elimination of the Fin-Syn Rule in 1995. (www.museum.tv)The success of its first primetime shows would lead to Fox introducing documentary-style shows such as Americas Most Wanted and Cops. But their biggest success would drive in when Fox reintroduced animation to the primetime slot with The Simpsons. The animated show would penetrate the top 30 primetime ratings and would then become the longest running buffoonery show on television (www.teletronic.co.uk).Soon, Fox found its niche by veering away from conventional shows, like game shows and talk shows, by introducing reality-based shows and shows that targeted the young viewers. Fox owner Rupert Murdoch would change the media landscape when it snatched exclusive rights to air the National Football League in 1993 (Kimmel, p. 162). This move would cement Foxs role in the ratings game. As of today, Foxs chief(prenominal) draw is its reality-based shows such as American Idol that have dominated airwaves since its release in 2002, capturing much of the 18-49 viewer demographic (tvbythenumbers.com).With success comes controversy. such(prenominal) was the case of the Fox news network as critics accused it of beingness biased towards the U.S. Republican Party (Greenwald, p.4). Despite these, Fox shows and its affiliated cable channels still rake in much of the ratings with Fox News attracting 2.4 million viewers in the first quarter of 2009 (Gold, www.latimesblogs.latimes.com)