High-tech Snooping Threatens Our Privacy :: Free Argumentative Essays

High-tech Snooping Threatens Our solitude The fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution statesThe right of the people to be unspoilt in their persons ho calls, papers, and effects, against un bonnie searches and seizures, shall non be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon likely cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The quaternary Amendment values privacy in the hearth and protects peoples privacy from unlawful search and invasion.This topic interests me because I am concern about the recent use of thermal imaging and the ways it could be used to invade the average citizens privacy. Thermal imaging contrivances allows police to work out pepperiness as a visible light image. When police use this technique as a means of gathering evidence forward a warrant is obtained, it can be said to violate our guaranteed Fourth Amendment rights under the Constitution. In the recent supreme Court case, Kyllo v. United Sates, the Supreme Court held that police use of a thermal imaging braid to scan a suspects residence violated his right under the Fourth Amendment. The decision had reversed a federal official appeals court ruling conclusion the scan lawful (Is warrantless?).In the case cited, police suspected Kyllo was maturement marijuana in his station. They used a thermal imaging doodad from across the street to scan Kyllos home to see if the level of heat escaping from it was consistent with high-intensity lights used to grow marijuana indoors. The result of the scan showed that portions of Kyllos home were relatively hot compared to the rest of his home. Using the result of the scan, as considerably as other information, police obtained a warrant to search Kyllos home, and nominate a marijuana-growing operation in their search.When the trial court refused to suppress the evidence, Kyllo appealed to the federal court and challenged the le gality of the search, saying a search warrant should prolong been obtained prior to using the thermal imaging device. Law-enforcement officials argued that a warrant was not required before a using technological surveillance device that merely records information about a home that is exposed to unexclusive view.The federal appeals court affirmed the trial courts decision, finding that Kyllo had no internal expectation of privacy because he did not try to conceal the heat escaping from his home. Even if he had, the appeals court said, there was no objectively reasonable expectation of privacy because the thermal imager did not expose any snug details of Kyllos life, only vague hot spots on his homes exterior.