Classics 2029: Roman Republican History
Week 7 the punic Wars (T.P.1)
Cormac Griffin: A1177407
What did the war against Hannibal reveal about the extent of capital of Italys sway over Italy at the blood line of the second century B.C.?
Introduction
Hannibals invasion of Italy shook Rome to its very core. A series of crushing military defeats, culminating at Cannae in 216 B.C. with the death of 50,000 - 70,000 Roman and allied troops (see Polybius, deem III, 107-118), led a number of Romes erst fleck allies to crack to the Carthaginian cause. As Toynbee nones the immediate effect of the battle of Cannae was to stop the Roman Commonwealth into two sections. One section seceded, while the other remained loyal (Toynbee, 1965, 109). This essay argues that, particularly post-Cannae, the war against Hannibal revealed the fly-by-night confederacy Rome maintained over Italy at the beginning of the second century B.C. Based on an exploration of the roles of Romes allies, however, it excessively argues that, while Roman control was demeaning, sometimes demanding and frequently abused, the fundamental majority of these allies remained unquestionably loyal to Rome and vie a vital role in the mho Punic War.
When examining the Punic Wars, in particular the Second Punic War, there are two main firsts of data, Polybius and Livy. both have their strengths and weaknesses. Livys work was written over a coke years after the war, is arguably biased and contains historical inaccuracies. Brunt has termed Livys work, where it is not supported by Polybius, as mere annalistic instauration (Brunt, 1971, 19). Polybius, in contrast, appears to be a more reliable source: for example, his work draws on conversations with surviving participants of the war, including the Numidian King Masinissa and Scipio Africanus intimate Laelius. However, Polybius also has his detractors.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment