The myth of Pygmalion and several(prenominal) other texts, including Cinderella and Frankenstein have been appropriated into different contexts in many forms of media including theatrical productions and films. Appropriations, such as the play, Pygmalion, by George Bernard Shaw, Cinderella and Frankenstein has interpreted the context from the myths and transformed into the reflection of the society in the condemnation of which they were composed.
Pygmalion was, in Greek legend, the King of Cyprus who throw in have sex with a attractive ivory statue, Galatea. The more than he looked upon her, the more deeply he fell in love with her, until he wished that she were more than a statue. Taking pity on him, the goddess; Aphrodite blew bread and butter into the statue and made it come alive as a beautiful woman. Shaws parody is clear in the way he fitting this myth to his play in integrating the concept of a perfect state for a womanish, and that Higgins was the creator. The difference between the original Pygmalion and Shaws play is that Pygmalion fell in love with his creation, whereas Higgins arrogantly desired admiration from his.
Cinderella on the other hand, was a tale of a happy female transformation, whereas in Pygmalion, Shaw was parodying romantic fiction and the unrealistic dreams of girls who hope to upgrade the social and economic ladder through marriage.
Shaw also includes themes of strain oppression and limited opportunities for women in male dominated societies. His desire and irony lie in the way he parodies this cock-and-bull story by giving it unlikely twists and turns. There are several parallels between the two texts, apart from concepts are obvious in characters, such as; Mrs. Higgins being the godmother and Freddy acting as Prince Charming.
Frankenstein is closely a scientist obsessed with his desire to penetrate the secret of...
If you lack to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment