Legalism

Differing Philosophies in ChinaIn the early eras of the great civilizations , leaders and philosophers grappled with the nature of presidency . They evolved from the state of nature notion of might makes right and began to determine the nature and qualities of effective govern handst . Han Feizi and Kautilya reflect opposing viewpoints on the appropriate vision of leadership . While Han Feizi s ideas are more consistent with modern notions of the nature of government , it is Kautiya s ideas that gain funds , and become the basis upon which leadership is derived for most places and times in historyKautilya supposes an adversarial relationship with the peasantry . He goes to great lengths to describe methods by which the pansy might employ spies to keep track of the doings of the commonwealth (The Arthashastra 10 .

He supplies a detailed methodology for sight on the populace going as far as to suggest that spies be disguised as holy men , the better to gain an honest account of the goings on in certain localities In the Thirteenth Major Rock he discusses a populace that might be resentful of a war of conquest , but argues that the great leader would work all people with respect and forgiveness . Han Feizi , in crinkle argues that the strict enforcement of laws in combination with harsh punishment is the top hat way to ensure obedience to the office of kingLand distribution is other issues addressed by both thinkers Ownership is assumed to be solely the purview of the leader , according...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper