The Major Impact of Dred Scott Case

Taney contended that slavery could non be banned by the territories and so the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional. sextette other justices agreed that Scott could not be a citizen, epoch both justices who were anti-slavery, John McLean of Ohio and Benjamin R. Curtis of Massachusetts, declared that Scott was free at one time he traveled into free territory. The verdict was not healthful received, and prompted patchy to emigrate, and others to object loudly to the opinion. In Philadelphia in April of 1857, two leading abolitionists, Robert Purvis and Charles Remond, inflexible that "the only certificate of indebtedness the aslope man owes to a disposition under which he is declared to be an inferior and put downd being...is to thieve and repudiate it" (Mullane 133). The decision was not nullified until the passage of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth A custodydments.

Purvis made an impassioned speech as a result of the Dred Scott case, resolving that, since the get together States would not recognize a washed-out man as a citizen, then this was final confirmation that they considered the colored nation as nothing but an alien, disenfranchised and degraded class (Mullane 132). He further resolved that there is nothing in the Constitution which bans slavery, and while some white men give care to think there is, just to ease there conscience, men of color should refute such evidence. He further resolved that colored people should n

Mullane, Dorothy. get across the Danger Water. New York, NY: Anchor Books, 1993.

Purvis' ideas were echoed by C. L. Redmond of Salem, Mass., who declared that for colored people to persist in claiming citizenship under the United States Constitution after this would be mean-spirited and craven (Mullane 138). He said that colored people owed no allegiance to a country that set them like dogs and ground them under its heels. Redmond said that the time for nationalism was gone, that he was no longer proud that the first job spilled in the American Revolution was that of a colored man, Attucks, and that he was no longer proud that his grandfather fought in th revolutionary war.

He now believed the liberty purchased by the argumentation of colored men was now used to enslave and degrade them, and he loathed a g overnment that could perpetrate such outrages on its people. He denounced the American Union in strong terms. The resolutions of Purvis and Remond were passed.

o longer supporting the administration which exercises the power of slavery over them, and that they owed no allegiance to such a Government, and that the only duty a colored man owed such a Government which declared him to be an inferior an degraded being was to denounce and repudiate it, and to do what they could by all proper representation to bring it into contempt.

At the time of her speeches, many suffragists were afraid of support from abolitionists, fearing they would taint their cause, and Sojourner was often greeted with hisses and boos (Mullane 185). She did not let this deter her, and relied on her physical presence and moral authority, as well as her slave experience to refute man's primacy on the grounds of his tops(predicate) intellect, the manhood of Christ, and the sins of the first mother. She exposed the hypocrisy of one sort arguing for its own rights while denying those of another.

Sojourner
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!